Monday, April 29, 2013

CHAPTER 3 TEST TOMORROW!!

Here are the updated Chapter 3 Notes for the Test tomorrow:
I have added the 9 Supreme Court Cases to the Study Guide.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2mk7v8cXovLdHJ0R2ZEc3JHZnc/edit?usp=sharing



Chapter 3 STUDY GUIDE


·       THE THREE PARTS OF THE CONSTITUTION:
o   Preamble
o   7 articles
o   27 amendments

·       NO ONE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER:
o   Through Checks and Balances, All of the different branches of government check each other so they all remain equal Ex. Congress has the power to make laws, but the president has the power to veto (reject) any act of Congress.

·       THE 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT:
o   Legislative (Make Laws)
o   Judicial (Interpret Laws)
o   Executive (Enforce Laws)

·       THE FIRST THREE ARTICLES: Create the three branches of government

·       WHAT ARE THE BILL OF RIGHTS? The first ten amendments (1-10)

·       What are the first ten Amendments?


1.     Freedom of speech, religion, assembly, press
2.     Bear arms (guns)
3.     Quartering of Troops
4.     Search and Seizure
5.     Rights of the Accused
6.     Speedy & Fair Trial
7.     Civil Trials
8.     Cruel and unusual punishment
9.     Rights reserved to the people
10.  Rights reserved to the states




·       WHAT ARE THE SIX UNDERLINING PRINCIPLES OF THE CONSTITUTION?

o   POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY: Government rules with the consent of the people Ex. Local and state elections

o   LIMITED GOVERNMENT:  government cannot infringe on your individual rights Ex. Search Warrant

o   SEPARATION OF POWER: each branch of government has their own power Ex. Legislative branch makes and passes laws

o   FEDERALISM: when the different levels of government (local, state, federal) share power Ex. NCLB

o   CHECKS AND BALANCES: the different branches of government check each other so they all remain equal ex. Presidential Veto

o   JUDICIAL REVIEW: when the judicial branch decides if the laws passed by congress are constitution or not Ex. Supreme court case

·       THE FIVE WAYS TO CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION:
o   Executive Action
o   Court Decisions
o   Party Practices
o   Custom and Usage
o   Basic Legislation
9 COURT CASES:

1.               ROPER V SIMMONS:
RELATE TO AN AMENDMENT: 6th Amendment, Speedy and fair trial and 8th Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishment)
SUMMARY: A juvenile offender was convicted of murder at age 17 and then sentenced to the death penalty the following year despite having been under 18 at the time of the offence (the crime)
RULING: The death penalty may not be imposed for offences committed before reaching age 18 because doing so would violate the U.S.

2.               MAPP V OHIO
                                    RELATE TO AMENDMENT: 4th Amendment Search and Seizure
SUMMARY: The police searched Mapp’s house saying they had a search warrant but in fact they did not. The police did not find the person they were looking for but they did find sexually explicit books and pictures. She was convicted and sentences to one to seven years in jail.
RULING: The Supreme Court ruled in Mapp’s favor since they seized her stuff without a search warrant. (Exclusionary Rule)

3.               LOVING V. VIRGINIA:
RELATE TO AMENDMENT: 9th Amendment: Right to privacy
                                    SUMMARY: An interracial couple that married and they were put in jail because it was against the law to marry interracial.
RULING: The Supreme court ruled in favor of the couple.

4.              TINKER V. Demoion:
RELATE TO AN AMENDMENT: First Amendment: Freedom of Speech
SUMMARY: Students wore black armbands to protest against the Vietnam War and they were suspended from school.  
RULING: The court ruled with Tinker.

5.               MIRANDA v ARIZONA
RELATE TO AN AMENDMENT: 5th Amendment (Rights of the accused)
SUMMARY: Arrested for kidnapping and sexual assault, Ernesto Miranda signed a confession including a statement that he had “full knowledge of [his] legal rights…” After conviction, he appealed, claiming that without counsel and without warnings, the confession was illegally gained. 
RULING: In favor of Miranda. The Court agreed with Miranda that “he must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to… an attorney and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him…” Miranda firmly upheld citizen rights to fair trials in State courts.

6.               ROE v WADE
RELATES TO AN AMENDMENT: 9th Amendment, right to privacy
SUMMARY: A Texas woman challenged a State law forbidding the artificial termination of a pregnancy, saying that she “had a fundamental right to privacy.” To have an abortion or not.
RULING: In favor of ROE. The Court upheld a woman’s right to choose in this case, saying the patient is free to determine, without regulation by the State, that... the patient’s pregnancy should be terminated” if in the first trimester. The decision struck down the State regulation of abortion in the first three months of pregnancy and was modified by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. Casey, 1992.

7.               GIDEON v WAINWRIGHT:
RELATE TO AMENDMENT: 6th Amendment, right to counsel
SUMMARY: In 1961 a Florida court found Clarence Earl Gideon guilty of breaking and entering and sentenced him to five years in prison. Gideon appealed his case to the Supreme Court on the basis that he had been unconstitutionally denied counsel (a lawyer) during his trial due to Florida’s policy of only providing appointed counsel in capital cases.
RULING: The Court ruled in favor of GIDEON. The Court granted Gideon a new trial, and he was found not guilty with the help of a court-appointed attorney. The “Gideon Rule” upheld the 6th Amendment’s guarantee of counsel of all poor persons facing a felony charge, a further incorporation of Bill of Rights guarantees into State constitutions.

8.               DALE v BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
RELATE TO AN AMENDMENT: First Amendment's expressive associational right
SUMMARY: A Homosexual boy scouts leader sued the Boy Scouts of America when they would not let him be a leader anymore.
RULING: The Supreme Court ruled that a private organization such as the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) can exclude a person from membership when "the presence of that person affects in a significant way the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints. The Supreme Court ruled that opposition to homosexuality is part of BSA's "expressive message" and that allowing homosexuals as adult leaders would interfere with that message.

9.               ATKINS V VIRGINIA
RELATE TO AN AMENDMENT:  8thCruel and Unusual Punishment
SUMMARY: He killed someone. The killer was mentally challenged.
RULING: The supreme ruled in his favor. They changed his sentence from capital punishment till life.

·       Full Faith and Credit Clause: 4th article: License in one state, it is valid in another state.

·       Which president holds the resident for holding office the longest? Franklin D Roosevelt. 4 Terms

·       Which amendment created term limits for the president? 22 Amendment

·       Why is the Constitution is called a living document? Because it is constantly changing and evolving to meet the needs of society.

·       Executive agreement and Treaty: Both are agreements between two or more sovereign states, but a treaty requires senatorial approval

·       GRAND JURY: looks at the evidence and see if their is enough evidence to try someone

·       PETITE JURY: Is the trial jury

·       EMINENT DOMAINS: the government has the right to take your private property for public use with just compensation.

·       Double Jeopardy: a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime.

No comments:

Post a Comment